Ultraformer III vs Ultraformer MPT: What’s the Difference?

Sep 7

3 min read

Ultraformer III and Ultraformer MPT both use focused ultrasound for lifting and tightening. MPT adds energy-delivery modes, faster delivery in selected settings and more handpiece options. At STC, we use Ultraformer III because its range of treatment depths lets us plan care for suitable concerns such as early cheek laxity and a less defined jawline. [1][2]

If you are wondering whether III is still worth having now that MPT is available, our answer is yes—when it fits the concern you want to treat. We start with your face and the change you want, then plan where and how deeply to treat.

The main differences

Feature	Ultraformer III	Ultraformer MPT
Core technology	Focused ultrasound with MMFU	Focused ultrasound with Micro-Pulsed Technology
Energy delivery	Points placed along treatment lines	Normal Mode and MP Mode options
Treatment heads	Cartridges for different depths and areas	Additional options, including Booster heads
What MPT adds	Treatment planned with III’s cartridges and lines	More delivery options and faster operation in selected modes

Both are made by CLASSYS and aim to stimulate collagen remodelling. Their differences include how energy is delivered and the treatment options available. [1][2]

What does MPT add to the treatment?

MPT stands for Micro-Pulsed Technology. It adds MP Mode alongside the dot-pattern delivery of Normal Mode, plus a Booster handpiece with circular energy delivery. These features give the practitioner more ways to carry out treatment. [2]

For you, the relevant differences are appointment time, the areas treated and how treatment feels. These still depend on the selected mode and energy. The “2.5 times faster” figure compares MP Mode with Normal Mode within MPT; it does not mean 2.5 times more lifting. [2]

Why we use Ultraformer III at STC

Ultraformer III lets us choose treatment depths to suit different areas. The lower cheeks and jawline do not necessarily need identical treatment, so cartridge choice and line placement are important parts of our plan. [3]

We look at laxity, tissue thickness and facial volume before starting. Someone whose cheeks are beginning to sag may need a different approach from someone with a hollow face who feels they look tired. We explain where III can help and where another treatment may be useful.

Should you switch if you have already had III?

If you were happy with your previous result, a new model alone is not a reason to switch. Start with how your face has changed and what you want to improve now. If the result fell short of your expectations, we would first review the treated areas, previous plan and response to understand what needs adjusting.

MPT does offer more treatment options. Comfort and lifting still depend on the individual plan, so changing the device alone cannot promise a better result every time.

FAQ

Are both III and MPT HIFU treatments?

Yes. Both belong to the focused-ultrasound family used for tightening. III uses MMFU, while MPT adds energy-delivery technology and modes.

Can I compare results by line count?

Line count is only part of the treatment. Depth, energy, cartridge and placement matter too. We explain the areas and purpose of your plan alongside its line count.

Can I start with III for a more defined jawline?

Yes, if suitable laxity is the main concern. We assess this first because fat and facial structure can also affect jawline definition.

Book an assessment with STC if you would like to address cheek laxity or your jawline. We can plan your Ultraformer III treatment and explain the changes you can reasonably expect.